RS

Gosh! How can you *still* consider Roy Suryo as an expert? What contribution (if any) has he made to ICT community other than vague methods (if any) of elaborating such and such porn (motion) pictures as fake or not? The 3-stanza Indonesia Raya anthem that had revealed how uninformed he was about its history while at the same time blamed others (Yayasan Air Putih, Des Alwi, etc) for his own lack of research? And after all of these, why is he quoted when he clearly, purposely insinuate bloggers and hackers like this:

“Saya yakin para blogger dan hacker pasti akan melakukan serangan terhadap sistem itu. Tetapi, kemungkinan ancaman tersebut bukan berarti melemahkan niat pemerintah,” katanya.

without being confronted with those who think otherwise (as if he is the only source of truth)? If he can walk away with such insinuation, why do others get into trouble when doing exactly the same thing? Only they specified names instead of accusing the whole group like he did (black campaign as always), which is worse. D’oh!

As an IT practitioner myself, I don’t see any sign of his expertise in the ICT field of study. At least, I don’t trust so-called ICT expert who have no idea what are and how to separate hacker from cracker. Call me subjective, I didn’t call myself an expert.

Links: http://www.kompas.com/read.php?cnt=.xml.2008.03.25.16513265&channel=1&mn=1&idx=1